Home
Search results “Privatization investment funds”
Private Sector vs.  Public Sector
 
02:11
If you were mailing an extremely important package, you'd probably trust FedEx more than the U.S. Postal Service. But why? Is it because FedEx is a private company, while the post office is run by the government? What are the differences between the "private sector" and the government sector? Why does it matter? Find out in this animated two-minute video. Donate today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2ylo1Yt This video is part of a collaborative business and economics project with Job Creators Network. To learn more about JCN, visit https://www.jobcreatorsnetwork.com. Joining PragerU is free! Sign up now to get all our videos as soon as they're released. http://prageru.com/signup Download Pragerpedia on your iPhone or Android! Thousands of sources and facts at your fingertips. iPhone: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsnbG Android: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsS5e Join Prager United to get new swag every quarter, exclusive early access to our videos, and an annual TownHall phone call with Dennis Prager! http://l.prageru.com/2c9n6ys Join PragerU's text list to have these videos, free merchandise giveaways and breaking announcements sent directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be donated to PragerU. Same great products. Same low price. Shopping made meaningful. VISIT PragerU! https://www.prageru.com FOLLOW us! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/ PragerU is on Snapchat! JOIN PragerFORCE! For Students: http://l.prageru.com/29SgPaX JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2c8vsff Script: If you had something really important to mail, would you head to the Post Office, which is run by the government and considered part of the public sector, or would you go to a place like UPS or FedEx, which are private businesses. Politicians in the media often talk about the private and public sectors of our economy but what's the difference? And which one is more effective? The private sector is made up of businesses or corporations owned by people. The private sector includes malls, grocery stores, and your local diner. To make a profit in the private sector, businesses must earn our money by offering us products and services that we want or need. When businesses have to compete for the same dollars, prices go down because no one wants to pay twice as much for shoes at one store if you can get the same pair cheaper at another place. On the other hand, the public sector is not supported by profits. It doesn't have to compete for our dollars. Instead, the public sector uses our tax dollars to fund its services. So we pay for these programs no matter how much or how little we use them. The government decides how our tax dollars should be spent in the public sector. This makes sense for some things. For example, you probably wouldn't want firefighters or police officers competing with one another for your business. In other cases though, this means things cost more or service is worse. The U.S. Post Office has $100 billion in debt and is regularly bailed out with taxpayer money. And the Department of Motor Vehicles isn't usually known for fast, friendly service. In contrast, private companies know that if they offer poor customer service and don't make money, they'll go out of business. When comparing the private sector with the public sector, it's clear that the market-driven private sector is more efficient. When you don't have to be profitable or accountable, things tend to be more expensive and the service is worse. So when there's a choice between a private sector or a government service, think about that package you really need delivered.
Views: 479218 PragerU
Long-term investments? - Privatisation!
 
02:18
With its plans for „long-term investments” the German federal government and the European Commission want to open public infrastructure in an entirely new scale to private investors like funds, banks and insurance companies. They shall be able to invest more easily in motorways, water pipe systems or prisons through new types of investment funds or project bonds – despite lots of negative experience with the privatisation of such structures and the privatisation model PPP that shall be used for this purpose. The German minister for economic affairs, Sigmar Gabriel, has therefore already convened a commission and plans to make the renovation of the ailing infrastructure a profit machine for banks and insurances. The citizens pay additionally and the public sector gets indebted for decades. But hardly anyone knows about it, because the project is planned under secrecy. Sign the petition against the Gabriel Commission: http://www.gemeingut.org/gabriel-stoppen/
Views: 1032 WEED e.V.
Tesla Privatization Update: What Now?
 
06:40
Follow Nikki on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/Aminorjourney Follow the show on Twitter https://www.twitter.com/TransportEvolve Buy Transport Evolved SWAG : https://shop.spreadshirt.com/Transportevolved/ Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/transportevolved Make a Bitcoin Donation. URI: bitcoin:1FJooSP4d9wNVWHyJSgP4me1HB2KX8MALW Subscribe to our second channel at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXQSHyC8muqdwKOWGiHuy4g Help Transport Evolved's Studio Drive Drive ;) https://www.amazon.com/registry/wishlist/AMDU1TULB8R6/ Last week, Elon Musk made a Tweet referencing taking Tesla private at a price of $420, with "funding secured." At the time we, and several other outlets, tried to speculate who it was that Musk had secured funding from, and postulated that the best fit seemed to be the Saudi Arabia Public Investment Fund (PIF)  Earlier today, Elon Musk made an official post on Tesla's website confirming that indeed this was the intended source of Tesla's privatization funding (https://www.tesla.com/blog/update-taking-tesla-private). But with some sources claiming that the Saudi Arabia PIF hasn't confirmed its intent to invest, it's still not clear what's going to happen next.  So, in order to help, here's what's going on thus far, what's likely to happen, and what hurdles need to be overcome for Tesla's privatization to occur.
Views: 15133 Transport Evolved
SSS Stock Investment Loan Program/Privatization Fund Loan Program/Option to Sell Shares Program
 
09:09
[Good Morning Pilipinas] Usapang SSS: SSS Stock Investment Loan Program/ Privatization Fund Loan Program/ Option to Sell Shares Program [07|27|16] For more news, visit: ►http://www.ptvnews.ph Subscribe to our YouTube channel: ►http://www.youtube.com/ptvphilippines Like our facebook page: ►PTV: http://facebook.com/PTVph ►Good Morning Boss: https://www.facebook.com/GMorningBoss ►[email protected]: http://facebook.com/PTVnewsat1 ►[email protected]: http://facebook.com/PTVnewsat6 ►NEWSLIFE: http://facebook.com/PTVnewslife ►PTV SPORTS: http://facebook.com/PTV4SPORTS Follow us at Twitter: ►http://twitter.com/PTVph Follow our livestream at ►http://ptvnews.ph/index.php/livestreammenu Ustream: ►http://www.ustream.tv/channel/ptv-livestream Watch our News Programs, every Monday to Friday RadyoBisyon - 6:00 am - 7:00 am Good Morning Boss - 7:00 am - 8:00 am [email protected] - 1:00 pm - 2:30 pm [email protected] - 6:00 pm - 7:00 pm PTV Sports - 7:00 pm - 8:00 pm NewsLife - 9:15 pm - 10:30 pm
Views: 368 PTV
FII2018 - Market forces: Which economic model for privatization will prevail?
 
39:05
Market-based capitalism is flourishing across the world, but new twists are emerging and gaining momentum. There are now success- ful state-led models in China and hybrid public-private frameworks in the Middle East. How do these trends impact the pathways to privatization across the world, and with it, the potential to increase productivity, improve quality of services, drive economic development, strengthen the business environment and catalyze innovation? How do privatization models compare? Will different and divergent frame- works continue to emerge — or will one clear model win out? What are the implications for the global economy? Moderator: Frank Kane, Arab News • H.E. Mohammed Al-Tuwaijri, Minister of Economy, Saudi Arabia • Kirill Dmitrie, CEO Russian Direct Investment Fund • Darren Davis, Acting CEO, Ma’aden, Saudi Arabia • Bassem Awadallah, CEO, Tomoh Advisory, UAE
Views: 397 Arab News
ELECTROBRAS STOCK ANALYSIS - PRIVATIZATION OPPORTUNITY
 
07:30
Electrobras (EBR) stock analysis. The Brazilian stock market offers intersting investment opportunities. Sven Carlin Research Platform: https://sven-carlin-research-platform.teachable.com/p/stock-market-research-platform Modern Value Investing book: KINDLE: https://amzn.to/2r184En PAPERBACK: https://amzn.to/2Kd55kN Sven Carlin blog: https://svencarlin.com/blog/
Privatizing Vietnam's State-Owned Companies
 
03:07
When Vietnam started privatizing state-owned enterprises in the 80s, the private sector, which includes local businesses, began to flourish. When Vinamilk, a dairy product company, was privatized the company expanded globally, and today are operating in more than 43 countries, surpassing $2billion revenues in 2016. That’s a lot of milk!
Views: 108194 IMF
Ukraine Large-Scale Privatization: State Property Fund chairman says investors waiting to buy assets
 
14:16
Joining Ukraine Today to discuss the government's plans for large-scale privatization in Ukraine is the Chairman of the State Property Fund of Ukraine Ihor Bilous. Check out our website: http://uatoday.tv Facebook: https://facebook.com/uatodaytv Twitter: https://twitter.com/uatodaytv
Views: 341 UKRAINE TODAY
Social Security vs. Private Retirement
 
04:36
Is Social Security a good retirement plan? Economics professor Antony Davies shows that Americans stand to earn significantly less and assume more risk with Social Security than other investment options. According to Davies, taxpayers would be better off both in terms of financial security and return on investment by investing their money privately. Social security is extremely expensive, soon to be insolvent, and doesn't even offer taxpayers the most bang for their buck. For those reasons, Prof. Davies argues that it is time for the government to phase out Social Security. Davies' solution: the government should honor its obligations to current retirees while giving Americans the freedom to invest their money as they see fit. Find LearnLiberty on... Twitter: http://bit.ly/RBl3Wv Facebook: http://on.fb.me/X9qijG Our Website: http://bit.ly/RBl3FH
Views: 128250 Learn Liberty
Economics of Rail Nationalisation (A Level Economics Revision)
 
21:23
This revision video for A Level Economics students assesses some of the arguments for and against taking the UK rail industry into full state ownership. For more key points on this crucial topic visit: https://www.tutor2u.net/economics/reference/economics-of-rail-nationalisation UK Rail Industry – Key Statistics (2016-17) Contributes £10bn per annum to GDP (gross value added) Employs 216,000 people (rail industry and supply chain) 3% passenger modal share 77% passenger satisfaction with punctuality £4.2 billion in government financial support (subsidy) 1.73 billion passenger journeys per year 48% of rail journeys cited for commuting Passenger income as a share of rail industry income has risen from 51% in 2010 to 71% in 2015 Broader issues in this debate over state v private A successful UK rail industry is needed to sustain and improve competitiveness / support tourism / regional economic balance UK rail network is expensive to run – in part a legacy from the Victorian age. Huge investment needs – unlikely that the private sector can provide sufficient funds Market failure issues are also important e.g. positive externalities from encouraging an increase in mass transport / reducing traffic congestion, affordable rail and geographical mobility of labour Much of the UK rail industry is already under state control / or direct regulation e.g. nearly half of fares, Government sets terms of franchises Affordability of rail travel is a major issue although dynamic pricing cuts fares for many segments of the market (e.g. student railcards)
Views: 7712 tutor2u
Saudi Economy Minister on Expat Fees, 2019 Economic Outlook, Privatization
 
09:22
Dec.20 -- Saudi Arabia expects to privatize seven companies in the first quarter of 2019, Economy and Planning Minister Mohammad Al Tuwaijri said, after plans to sell stakes in state assets got off to a slow start. Al Tuwaijri spoke exclusively to Bloomberg's Yousef Gamal El-Din in Riyadh.
Elon Musk Said He May Privatize Tesla, Then Stocks Soared | Velshi & Ruhle | MSNBC
 
05:18
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, says he wants to take his company private and has the funding to do it. Stephanie Ruhle and Financial Times contributor James Fontanella-Khan discuss who these mystery investors might be and if shareholders will vote with Musk. » Subscribe to MSNBC: http://on.msnbc.com/SubscribeTomsnbc About: MSNBC is the premier destination for in-depth analysis of daily headlines, insightful political commentary and informed perspectives. Reaching more than 95 million households worldwide, MSNBC offers a full schedule of live news coverage, political opinions and award-winning documentary programming -- 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Connect with MSNBC Online Visit msnbc.com: http://on.msnbc.com/Readmsnbc Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersYouTube Find MSNBC on Facebook: http://on.msnbc.com/Likemsnbc Follow MSNBC on Twitter: http://on.msnbc.com/Followmsnbc Follow MSNBC on Instagram: http://on.msnbc.com/Instamsnbc Elon Musk Said He May Privatize Tesla, Then Stocks Soared | Velshi & Ruhle | MSNBC
Views: 19413 MSNBC
Is Funding Space Exploration a Good Investment?
 
03:11
--Caller asks David whether spending government money on space exploration is worthwhile --On the Bonus Show: Economics & education, rich Indian offers free 4G internet to 1 billion people, Obama announces plan to clear Laos' unexploded bombs, more... Support TDPS by clicking (bookmark it too!) this link before shopping on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/?tag=thedavpaksho-20 Website: https://www.davidpakman.com Become a Member: https://www.davidpakman.com/membership David's Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/david.pakman Discuss This on Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpakmanshow/ Support Our Sponsors: http://www.influencerbridge.com/davidpakman Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/davidpakmanshow TDPS Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/davidpakmanshow David's Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/dpakman TDPS Gear: http://www.davidpakman.com/gear 24/7 Voicemail Line: (219)-2DAVIDP Subscribe to The David Pakman Show for more: http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=midweekpolitics Timely news is important! We upload new clips every day, 6-8 stories! Make sure to subscribe! Broadcast on September 9, 2016 --Donate via Bitcoin: 15evMNUN1g4qdRxywbHFCKNfdCTjxtztfj --Donate via Ethereum: 0xe3E6b538E1CD21D48Ff1Ddf2D744ea8B95Ba1930 --Donate via Litecoin: LhNVT9j5gQj8U1AbwLzwfoc5okDoiFn4Mt --Donate via Bitcoin: 15evMNUN1g4qdRxywbHFCKNfdCTjxtztfj --Donate via Ethereum: 0xe3E6b538E1CD21D48Ff1Ddf2D744ea8B95Ba1930 --Donate via Litecoin: LhNVT9j5gQj8U1AbwLzwfoc5okDoiFn4Mt
Views: 2883 David Pakman Show
Monkeynomics 101: Complete Investments Series
 
02:09:51
This is my entire Monkeynomics 101 series pertaining to investments in a single video! Some things were cut (like the intros between videos) in order to make it all fit within the YouTube maximum length of 2 hours and 10 minutes. Time Codes and Sources: 0:00 Monkeynomics 101: Becoming the 1%, Time Value of Money (TVM), and the Rule of 72 US Global Investors: What Does It Take to Be in the Top 1 Percent? Not As Much As You Think http://www.usfunds.com/investor-library/frank-talk/what-does-it-take-to-be-in-the-top-1-percent-not-as-much-as-you-think/#.VRSm7_nF9Mh Financial Samurai: Who Are The Top 1% Income Earners? http://www.financialsamurai.com/who-are-the-top-1-income-earners/ U.S. Median Income http://www.mybudget360.com/how-much-do-americans-earn-what-is-the-average-us-income/ Average Single Person Living Expenses http://classroom.synonym.com/average-living-expenses-single-person-13250.html Tax Calculator: http://www.tax-rates.org/income-tax-calculator/ Bloomberg Retirement Calculator http://www.bloomberg.com/personal-finance/calculators/retirement/ 9:46 Monkeynomics 101: Debt Management and Bankruptcy ANDEX Chart (Morningstar) http://www.assante.com/advisors/pmoore/documents/AndexWallCANENG.pdf Average American Debts http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/my-money/2014/07/01/5-things-keeping-americans-from-financial-freedom http://www.nerdwallet.com/blog/credit-card-data/average-credit-card-debt-household/ Student Loans: $32,264 APR 5% https://studentaid.ed.gov/types/loans/interest-rates Credit Card Debt: $15,611 APR 14.9% http://www.lowcards.com/dummies-guide-to-credit/credit-card-usage Auto Loan Debt $27,000 APR 4.31% http://www.bankrate.com/finance/auto/rate-roundup.aspx Mortgage Debt: $155,192 APR 3.8% http://www.bankrate.com/finance/mortgages/current-interest-rates.aspx Average 401K Balance $101,650 https://blog.personalcapital.com/retirement-planning/average-401k-balance-age/ Dave Ramsey http://www.daveramsey.com/home/ Terrance Popp: “Deadbeat Dad Dilemma” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTHTsemlHEk Bankruptcy: Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/chapter-7-13-bankruptcy-limits-benefits-30025.html Chapter 13 Bankruptcy FAQ: http://www.suttonlawdenverwest.com/resources/chapter13common.html Song: “William Tell Overture” by Rossini. Courtesy of the YouTube Audio Library. 23:08 Monkeynomics 101: Career Planning, College, and Capital Budgeting UPDATE: Free IT certification prep-materials at http://www.cybrary.it/ Thanks to MGTOW Bachelor for the link. Free Online Courses with Certificates: http://alison.com/ Where Did You Go to College? Employers Don't Care: http://www.businessnewsdaily.com/5997-ivy-league-degrees-less-valuable-in-job-search.html Online Schools and Colleges: California http://www.accreditedschoolsonline.org/california/ Business Insider: Duke Grad Student Secretly Lived In a Van To Escape Loan Debt http://www.businessinsider.com/ken-ilgunas-lived-in-his-van-to-pay-for-college-2013-6?op=1 The 15 Most Profitable Industries: https://www.sageworks.com/datareleases.aspx?article=245&title=The-15-most-profitable-industries&date=August-6-2014?utm_source=forbes&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=04132013 Capital Budget Calculator: http://www.ultimatecalculators.com/quick_capital_budget_calculator.html 39:11 Monkeynomics 101: Retirement Planning IRS: Retirement Plans: http://www.irs.gov/Retirement-Plans/Plan-Sponsor/Types-of-Retirement-Plans-1 Forbes: Want To Be A Millionaire In Retirement? Start Saving 10% Of Your Salary In Your 20s. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jennifereum/2014/10/30/want-to-be-a-millionaire-in-retirement-start-saving-10-of-your-salary-in-your-20s/ IS SOCIAL SECURITY WELFARE?: http://fff.org/explore-freedom/article/is-social-security-welfare/ Treasury.gov: Intergovernmental Debt (Social Security Trust Fund) https://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/charts/principal/principal_govpub.htm 401K VS IRA: http://www.fool.com/retirement/iras/2014/10/22/ira-vs-401k-which-is-better-for-you.aspx Investment Only Variable Annuities (IOVA): http://www.annuityfyi.com/variable-annuities/recent-variable-annuity-innovations-provide-growth-safety/ 53:32 Monkeynomics 101: Asset Diversification 1:15:53 Monkeynomics 101: Market Cycles, Emotional Investing, and Risk Tolerance Warren Buffett Story Source: http://www.cheatsheet.com/personal-finance/warren-buffetts-15-most-memorable-quotes.html/?a=viewall 1:26:39 Monkeynomics 101: Getting Started with Investing 1:40:21 Monkeynomics 101: Constructing a Portfolio Wall Street Journal: The Average Stock Price Is Expensive; Get Used to It http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013/06/04/the-average-stock-price-is-expensive-get-used-to-it/ Investopedia: Beta http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/beta.asp Google Finance: S&P500 Index https://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXSP%3A.INX&ei 1:58:17 Monkeynomics 101: Incorporating Bonds
Views: 43904 Turd Flinging Monkey
Meet The Tesla Rival Competing for Saudi Money
 
02:20
With Elon Musk's recent erratic behavior, Tesla could be in trouble. A new competitor, Lucid Motors, is vying for investment from the same fund that could take Tesla private. Subscribe to Cheddar on YouTube: http://chdr.tv/subscribe Connect with Cheddar! On Facebook: http://chdr.tv/facebook On Twitter: http://chdr.tv/twitter On Instagram: http://chdr.tv/instagram On Cheddar.com: http://chdr.tv/cheddar
Views: 14307 Cheddar
Tesla Privatization, Interview w/ Tesla Daily
 
38:17
HyperChange Founder Galileo Russell interviews Rob Maurer of Tesla Daily about Tesla's privatization and the implications for the company and its shareholders. Let us know what you think in the comments below! Thanks to Patreon producers Rand's Quality Eggs & Carla Grandori! Become a #HyperChanger & support us on Patreon to receive the exclusive weekly HyperChange Newsletter!! https://www.patreon.com/hyperchange LINK - Checkout Rob's Podcast, Tesla Daily! http://techcastdaily.com/ HyperChange Twitter: https://twitter.com/HyperChangeTV HyperChange Instagram: http://instagram.com/Hyperchange HyperChange Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HyperChange/ Music by Marko: https://soundcloud.com/markothedon & Fritz Carlton: https://soundcloud.com/fritzcarlton Disclaimer: This video is purely my opinion and should not be regarded as factual information. I am not a financial advisor. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell securities. Do not assume any facts and numbers in this video are accurate. Always do your own due diligence. As of 08/08/2018 HyperChange host (Galileo Russell) is invested in shares of Tesla (TSLA), long Maker & Bitcoin.
Views: 19232 HyperChange TV
Mutual Funds Vs ETFs - Which one is Better and Why!
 
01:41
Mutual funds are an investing staple for many investors due to the diversification they provide. Learn it in this video. Mutual Funds Vs ETFs - Which one is Better and Why! ***Subscribe To Our Chanel For More Videos***
Views: 232 Market Legends
Still a Better Deal: Private Investment vs. Social Security
 
24:12
http://www.cato.org/multimedia/events/still-better-deal-private-investment-vs-social-security Critics of private investment of Social Security taxes have long pointed to the supposed dangers of an unstable market as creating conditions too risky to allow workers personal choice in planning for retirement. Indeed, the financial crisis is often used to bolster the argument that retirement funds are best left in the safe hands of the state, but how true is this claim? In a new Cato study, "Still a Better Deal: Private Investment vs. Social Security," Cato Senior Fellow Michael Tanner demonstrates that actual investment returns over the past 40 years show that a system of private investment will, in fact, provide significantly higher rates of return than the current Social Security system.
Views: 1312 The Cato Institute
Privatization: questions and answers of Mrs. Baljeet Grewal
 
05:51
Why privatization is important for Kazakhstan’s economy? What kind of benefits privatization provide for Fund and portfolio companies? What challenges privatization can face and how to deal with them? Why investors should buy stakes in Samruk-Kazyna assets? Managing Director for Strategy and Portfolio Investment, Management Board member of "Samruk-Kazyna" JSC Mrs Baljeet Grewal will answer this questions.
Views: 808 Samruk Kazyna
In 60 seconds:  The privatisation of Britain's groundbreaking green bank
 
01:16
The first privatisation of Theresa May's government just happened. The Green Investment Bank was sold to Australian bank Macquarie for roughly £2 billion. It sounds geeky, but it's pretty important, so here's Energydesk reporter Zach to explain it all to you in 60 seconds.
Disinvestment | Meaning | Purpose | Objective | Importance | Diff. between Pvt. & Disinvestment |
 
10:49
Meaning Investment refers to the conversion of money or cash into securities, debentures, bonds or any other claims on money. As follows, disinvestment involves the conversion of money claims or securities into money or cash. When Govt. decides to retain the ownership as well control over the mgt. of the company, it sell a portion of the total shares maximum of 49% and gets the fund and henceforth Govt. will get 51% of the total profit of the company and balance 49% will go to those whosoever purchased those Shares. Purpose The new economic policy initiated in July 1991 clearly indicated that PSUs had shown a very negative rate of return on capital employed. Inefficient PSUs & Government’s resources were turning to be more of liabilities to the Government than assets. Many undertakings traditionally established as pillars of growth had become a burden on the economy. The national GDP and gross national savings were also getting affected by low returns from PSUs. About 10 to 15 % of the total gross domestic savings were getting reduced on account of low savings from PSUs. In relation to the capital employed, levels of profits were too low. Need 1.) Price policy of public sector undertakings 2.) Under–utilisation of capacity 3.) Problems related to planning and construction of projects 4.) Problems of labour, personnel and management 5.) Lack of autonomy  Objective 1.) To reduce the financial burden on the Government 2.) To improve public finances 3.) To introduce, competition and market discipline 4.) To fund growth 5.) To encourage wider share of ownership 6.) To depoliticise non-essential services
Views: 2612 Smart Education
Multi-billion rand investments in several private sector and state-owned companies
 
02:20
The largest pot of money pooled on the continent is the consolidated pension savings of South Africa's public servants, the Government Employment Pension Fund and its investment arm, the Public Investment Corporation. Appearing before Parliament's Standing Committee on Finance, they explained their multi-billion rand investments in several private sector and state-owned companies. For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
Views: 212 SABC Digital News
Breaking News  - I have found old Kleinwort European Privatization shares
 
06:32
My wife died recently and during the process of probate and getting documents in order I discovered a long lost file.It contained the remnants of page 50, The Mail on Sunday, January 23, 1994 and papers relating to shares and warrants in Kleinwort European Privatization Investment Trust.My address at the time was in Scotland but changed about 20 years ago and I have lost track of the trust, so my question is how does one trace these shares?There may be other 87-year-old computer illiterates who have this problem and would be interested.Tanya Jefferies, of This is Money, replies: Many people have old, long-forgotten share documents tucked away, and don't know what to do when they discover them years later.Over the years companies often merge or change names so tracking down shares isn't always straightforward.We asked an investing expert from a top stockbroking firm how to investigate old shares purchased in the past and find out what they are worth now.Laith Khalaf of Hargreaves Lansdown explains how best to pursue such enquiries below.We also approached Experian to run a search on its Unclaimed Assets Register.This normally costs people £25, but it looked into this one for free and contacted you direct to discuss what you remember about your shares.If a search on its register doesn't turn up anything straight away, Experian will keep the request open for another six years.Unfortunately, in your case it wasn't able to find your investment in the first instance, but you will now remain on its books in case it discovers anything else during this period.The Mail on Sunday's library unearthed a copy of the paper from the date you gave, and the advertisement about your investment trust that appeared on page 50 is reproduced above.Laith Khalaf, senior analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, replies: Tracing old investments can be a tricky procedure, particularly if they were bought before the internet age when information was less readily available.Developments in the investment industry now mean that this is less likely to happen, as most investors now hold their investments together in one account which they can view and manage online.However, sometimes old documents pop up which relate to investments made when paper was the norm, which can present a bit more of a challenge.Usually any documentation that you have will contain the name and number of the company which administers your investment.This might be a share registrar, fund manager, or broker, depending on what kind of investment it is and who bought it. In which case it’s just a matter of calling them up and finding out what happened to your investment and how you go about selling it.Occasionally there may be a little bit of pillar to post in this endeavour seeing as over such a long time period, it’s possible the administration of the investment has changed hands.Indeed that would appear to be the case with this trust, which was wound up in the 1990s.Your investment may have been returned in cash, o AutoNews- Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/diyinvesting/article-5279033/I-old-Kleinwort-European-Privatization-shares.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
Views: 1 US Sciencetech
Trump's Infrastructure Plan Is A Wall Street Privatization Racket
 
08:29
Read More At: http://theweek.com/speedreads/754859/trump-proposes-privatizing-federal-assets-including-airports-freeways-international-space-station http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/trump-administration-conflicts-interest-how-gary-cohn-could-sell-us-infrastructure Support The Show On Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/seculartalk Here's Our Amazon Link: https://www.amazon.com/?tag=seculacom-20 Follow Kyle on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kylekulinski Like the show on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/SecularTalk Clip from The Kyle Kulinski Show, which airs live on Blog Talk Radio and Secular Talk Radio Monday - Friday 11:00 AM - 12:30 PM Eastern time zone. Listen to the Live Show or On Demand archive at: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kylekulinski Check out our website - and become a member - at: http://www.SecularTalkRadio.com
Views: 32137 Secular Talk
Part privatisation of Spain's Aena attracts fewer core investors than expected
 
00:36
The sale of a 49 percent stake in the world's biggest airports operator, Spain's Aena, has not exactly taken off. Local media reported there was interest from just three potential core investors for what is one of the largest initial public offerings of shares in Europe this year. Reportedly there were bids from Ferrovial, Corporacion Financiera Alba and the Children's Investment Fund. That is below the "six or seven" institutional investors the Spanish government had said last month would … READ MORE : http://www.euronews.com/2014/10/09/part-privatisation-of-spain-s-aena-attracts-fewer-core-investors-than-expected euronews business brings you latest updates from the world of finance and economy, in-depth analysis, interviews, infographics and more Subscribe for daily dose of business news: http://bit.ly/1pcHCzj Made by euronews, the most watched news channel in Europe.
Views: 93 euronews Business
Chiles privatized social security may risk bankruptcy
 
05:36
Chile has gone further than any other country in privatizing social security, embracing private pension accounts in 1981. But the fund will soon be paying out more than it takes in and is projected to be exhausted by 2036. Worldfocus special correspondent Edie Magnus reports on the health of private social security and new regulation from the Chilean government. http://worldfocus.org/blog/2009/12/10/chiles-privatized-social-security-may-risk-bankruptcy/8842/
Views: 1512 worldfocusonline
Bird & Fortune - Silly Money  - Investment Bankers
 
16:32
The Long Johns discuss investment banking, London style, with points to the American mortgage market and Wall Street. Brilliant.
Views: 178989 fusion07mp4
Air India privatisation explained
 
02:35
A parliamentary panel says this isn't a right time to privatise Air India and that the airline should be given at least five years to revive. The panel says the Centre should review its decision to privatise the state-run airline and explore the possibility of 'an alternative to disinvestment of our national carrier which is our national pride'. ---------------------- About the Channel: Watch Business Today videos to get the latest news on Business, stock market, sensex - BSE India, NSE India, personal finance, gold prices, petrol prices and more. Also, get an insight into the dealings of the top companies in India from Business Today's award-winning journalists. Get up to date with all investment options (Mutual Funds, SIPs, Debt, Equity, Insurance, Home Loans, Pension Schemes, Retirement Plans) from our Money Today team. Also, watch interviews of top CEOs. Regular shows to watch out: The Good The Bad and The Ugly with BusinessToday.in Editor Rajeev Dubey to know the top stories of the day specially curated from the world of business and economy. Watch Inside India's Factories to find out how different products get manufactured and processed for final consumption. You can follow us at: Website: https://www.businesstoday.in Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BusinessToday Twitter: https://twitter.com/BT_India Google Plus: https://plus.google.com/+businesstoday
Views: 2384 Business Today
Why did we sell off the railways?
 
15:45
► Read - Frustration grows with Britain’s fragmented network https://on.ft.com/2qhkAA2 Miranda Green tracks down the politicians who privatised Britain's railways, and speaks to key supporters of Jeremy Corbyn's plan for re-nationalisation. ► Subscribe to FT.com here:http://bit.ly/2GakujT ► Subscribe to the Financial Times on YouTube: http://bit.ly/FTimeSubs ► Read Moscow thanks UK for helping Putin win landslide vote in Russia: http://on.ft.com/2pthnNt For more video content from the Financial Times, visit http://www.FT.com/video Twitter https://twitter.com/ftvideo Facebook https://www.facebook.com/financialtimes
Views: 460697 Financial Times
Stossel: Free-Market Social Security
 
06:00
How to reform social security so that it won't bankrupt us. --------- Subscribe to our YouTube channel: http://youtube.com/reasontv Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason.Magaz... Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/reason Subscribe to our podcast at iTunes: https://goo.gl/az3a7a Reason is the planet's leading source of news, politics, and culture from a libertarian perspective. Go to reason.com for a point of view you won't get from legacy media and old left-right opinion magazines. --------- Today is the 83rd anniversary of Social Security, and this year it went into the red. In the long run, it has a shortfall of $32 trillion. John Stossel says that the program is unsustainable. Young people shouldn't expect it to cover their retirement. Romina Boccia explains the Heritage Foundation's plan to allow young people to contribute to their Social Security payments via private investment accounts. Those private accounts would likely grow faster than people's contributions to Social Security, and young people could invest in "whatever floats your boat," Boccia tells Stossel. Private investment accounts have been tried in other parts of the world. When Chile started them in 1981, it was poorer than most Latin American countries. Now it's the very richest. Yet mass demonstrations denounce it for being run privately, and for companies taking some of the profit. They miss the fact that Chileans have more money for retirement than most Latin Americans only because of their private accounts. Privatization is also unpopular in America, and so are Boccia's other proposals. She and Heritage would raise the retirement age to 70 to account for rising lifespans. "When Social Security was actually founded, life expectancy was below 65," Boccia tells Stossel. Now it's 78. Stossel tells Boccia: "What you guys are pushing is the right thing to do, but it's not popular." She replies: "It is not popular, but I think people don't fully understand how these programs work." The good news is that this was the first time that when Stossel went to talk with people on the street, most people understood the problem. One man called it a "Ponzi scheme" and asked, "why not take it and invest it in the stock market and let it grow that way?" A woman summed it up well: "The country's in a deficit; there's a point where you can't pay out and go in the negative forever." The views expressed in this video are solely those of John Stossel; his independent production company, Stossel Productions; and the people he interviews. The claims and opinions set forth in the video and accompanying text are not necessarily those of Reason.
Views: 46789 ReasonTV
Pension funds and privatization [3]
 
23:46
Brian O'Keefe - trustee on the Sponsors Board of OMERS (Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System)
Views: 100 LeftStreamed
Smash School Privatisation: Hedge Fund Bank Robber Protest
 
06:40
Friday 26 September 2008: following the invasion of their headquarters (http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=A4Wbia2BQKk) teachers and parents loudly protested outside the Ark offices, the "charity" of Swiss/French financier and philanthropist Arpad (Arki) Busson, the most favoured sponsor of Tony Blair's Academy school system. Academy schools are state schools taken over by private sponsors, such as religious groups and private or corporate interests. The UK taxpayer still pays for the school, the private sponsors profit from the school, and parents and local council have no say in the running of the school. The unelected undemocratic sponsor dictates all.
Views: 878 JasonNParkinson
President Bush and Privatizing Social Security: Personal Retirement Accounts - Finance (2005)
 
41:00
Social Security is a social insurance program officially called "Old-age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance" (OASDI), in reference to its three components. It is primarily funded through a dedicated payroll tax. During 2012, total benefits of $786 billion were paid out versus income (taxes and interest) of $840 billion, a $54 billion annual surplus. Excluding interest of $109 billion, the program had a cash deficit of $55 billion. Estimates of lost revenues due to the temporary payroll tax cuts of 2011 and 2012 were offset by transfers of other government funds into the program; this was $114 billion in 2012. An estimated 161 million people paid into the program and 57 million received benefits in 2012, roughly 2.82 workers per beneficiary. Reform proposals continue to circulate with some urgency, due to a long-term funding challenge faced by the program. Starting in 2011 and continuing thereafter, program expenses were expected to exceed cash revenues, due to the aging of the baby-boom generation (resulting in a lower ratio of paying workers to retirees), expected continuing low birth rate (compared to the baby-boom period), and increasing life expectancy. Further, the government has borrowed and spent the accumulated surplus funds, called the Social Security Trust Fund.[2] At the end of 2012, the Trust Fund was valued at $2.7 trillion, up $54 billion from 2011. The Trust Fund consists of the accumulated surplus of program revenues less expenditures. In other words, $2.7 trillion more Social Security payroll taxes have been collected than have been used to pay Social Security beneficiaries; the program has more than fully funded itself.[3] The fund contains non-marketable Treasury securities backed "by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government." The funds borrowed from the program are part of the total national debt of $16.8 trillion as of April 2013.[4] Program payouts exceeded cash program revenues (i.e., revenue excluding interest) in 2011; this shortfall is expected to continue indefinitely under current law. Due to interest, the Trust Fund will continue increasing through the end of 2021, reaching a peak of approximately $3.0 trillion. Social Security has the legal authority to draw amounts from other government revenue sources besides the payroll tax, to fully fund the program, while the Trust Fund exists. However, payouts greater than payroll tax revenue and interest income over time will liquidate the Trust Fund by 2033, meaning that only the ongoing payroll tax collections thereafter will be available to fund the program.[5] There are certain key implications to understand under current law, if no reforms are implemented: Payroll taxes will only cover about 75% of the scheduled payout amounts from 2033-2086. Without changes to the law, Social Security would have no legal authority to draw other government funds to cover the shortfall. Between 2022 and 2033, redemption of the Trust Fund balance to pay retirees will draw approximately $3 trillion in government funds from sources other than payroll taxes. This is a funding challenge for the government overall, not just Social Security. The present value of unfunded obligations under Social Security was approximately $8.6 trillion over a 75-year forecast period (2012-2086). In other words, that amount would have to be set aside in 2012 so that the principal and interest would cover the shortfall for 75 years. The estimated annual shortfall averages 2.5% of the payroll tax base or 0.9% of gross domestic product (a measure of the size of the economy). Measured over the infinite horizon, these figures are $20.5 trillion, 3.9% and 1.3%, respectively. The annual cost of Social Security benefits represented 5.0% of GDP in 2011. This is projected to increase gradually to 6.4% of GDP in 2035 and then decline to about 6.1% of GDP by 2055 and remain at about that level through 2086. Former President George W. Bush called for a transition to a combination of a government-funded program and personal accounts ("individual accounts" or "private accounts") through partial privatization of the system. President Barack Obama "strongly opposes" privatization or raising the retirement age, but supports raising the annual maximum amount of compensation that is subject to the Social Security payroll tax ($110,100 of compensation in 2012, and $113,700 in 2013) to help fund the program. In addition, on February 18, 2010, President Obama issued an executive order mandating the creation of the bipartisan National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, which made ten specific recommendations to ensure the sustainability of Social Security. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_debate_in_the_United_States
Views: 1220 The Film Archives
Colombia faces backlash over private energy deal
 
02:45
Colombia’s government is facing an uproar from citizens as it sold its major stake in Power Generator Isagen SA to a Canadian Investment fund. This is the biggest privatization deal for Colombia in the last decade.
Views: 98 CGTN America
From Socialism to Capitalism: U.S. Investment in the Russian Market Economy - George Soros (1998)
 
01:01:12
The conversion of the world's largest state-controlled economy into a market-oriented economy would have been extraordinarily difficult regardless of the policies chosen. The policies chosen for this difficult transition were (1) liberalization, (2) stabilization, and (3) privatization. These policies were based on the neoliberal "Washington Consensus" of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, and U.S. Treasury Department. The programs of liberalization and stabilization were designed by Yeltsin's deputy prime minister Yegor Gaidar, a 35-year-old liberal economist inclined toward radical reform, and widely known as an advocate of "shock therapy". The partial results of liberalization (lifting price controls) included worsening already apparent hyperinflation, initially due to monetary overhang and exacerbated after the central bank, an organ under parliament, which was skeptical of Yeltsin's reforms, was short of revenue and printed money to finance its debt. This resulted in the near bankruptcy of much of Russian industry. The process of liberalization would create winners and losers, depending on how particular industries, classes, age groups, ethnic groups, regions, and other sectors of Russian society were positioned. Some would benefit by the opening of competition; others would suffer. Among the winners were the new class of entrepreneurs and black marketeers that had emerged under Mikhail Gorbachev's perestroika. But liberalizing prices meant that the elderly and others on fixed incomes would suffer a severe drop in living standards, and people would see a lifetime of savings wiped out. With inflation at double-digit rates per month as a result of printing, macroeconomic stabilization was enacted to curb this trend. Stabilization, also called structural adjustment, is a harsh austerity regime (tight monetary policy and fiscal policy) for the economy in which the government seeks to control inflation. Under the stabilization program, the government let most prices float, raised interest rates to record highs, raised heavy new taxes, sharply cut back on government subsidies to industry and construction, and made massive cuts in state welfare spending. These policies caused widespread hardship as many state enterprises found themselves without orders or financing. A deep credit crunch shut down many industries and brought about a protracted depression. The rationale of the program was to squeeze the built-in inflationary pressure out of the economy so that producers would begin making sensible decisions about production, pricing and investment instead of chronically overusing resources—a problem that resulted in shortages of consumer goods in the Soviet Union in the 1980s. By letting the market rather than central planners determine prices, product mixes, output levels, and the like, the reformers intended to create an incentive structure in the economy where efficiency and risk would be rewarded and waste and carelessness were punished. Removing the causes of chronic inflation, the reform architects argued, was a precondition for all other reforms: Hyperinflation would wreck both democracy and economic progress, they argued; they also argued that only by stabilizing the state budget could the government proceed to dismantle the Soviet planned economy and create a new capitalist Russia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Russia_(1992%E2%80%93present) Image By Wecameasromans (Own work) [CC-BY-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
Views: 3225 The Film Archives
Swarm Fund | The A.I. Driven Investment Economy | CEO Philipp Pieper | CoinAgenda Summit Conference
 
03:28
https://www.swarm.fund Recorded Live at CoinAgenda Summit Conference at Caesar's Palace Conference Center. SCN Corporate Connect's Amber Marsala sits down with CEO Philipp Pieper to discuss the latest with the Swarm Fund. Swarm is the blockchain for private equity. We bring high-return alternative asset classes to everyone and use AI to continuously improve investments. Swarm Fund is the blockchain for private equity. It’s a fully decentralized capital market place that democratizes investing by using the power of the blockchain to open up high-return, alternative investment classes to smaller investors through asset-backed funds using cryptocurrency tokens. It makes traditionally exclusive investment opportunities, such as private equity and hedge funds, inclusive for the Swarm by pooling together smaller investments into larger, institutional-sized blocks. Swarm Fund also gives fund managers access to more capital from a new asset class of investors who want access to institutional-type investments, but don’t have the high minimums many institutional funds require. Pilot investment vehicles on the Swarm Fund platform include a Distressed Real Estate Fund, a Solar Energy Fund, and a Crypto Hedge Fund. To Learn More About the CoinAgenda Conference Series: http://www.coinagenda.com/
Privatization in Nigeria with Bolanle Onagoruwa
 
07:23
(www.abndigital.com) The issue of privatization has been a subject of intense global debate in recent years. In Africa, it has remained highly controversial and politically risky. Privatization in Nigeria has not been a popular reform and joining ABN in our Abuja studio is Bolanle Onagoruwa, Director General, Bureau of Public Enterprises.
Views: 783 CNBCAfrica
Why Trump’s infrastructure plan should be privatized
 
02:41
President Trump held a bipartisan meeting to push ahead his infrastructure plan. Fox News contributor Karl Rove explains why infrastructure should be privatized.
Views: 1136 Fox Business
Social Security Won't Give You Security
 
05:43
If you're counting on Social Security to finance your retirement, you're in for a big surprise. Money expert Chris Hogan explains why. Donate today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2eB2p0h Joining PragerU is free! Sign up now to get all our videos as soon as they're released. http://prageru.com/signup Download Pragerpedia on your iPhone or Android! Thousands of sources and facts at your fingertips. iPhone: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsnbG Android: http://l.prageru.com/2dlsS5e Join Prager United to get new swag every quarter, exclusive early access to our videos, and an annual TownHall phone call with Dennis Prager! http://l.prageru.com/2c9n6ys Join PragerU's text list to have these videos, free merchandise giveaways and breaking announcements sent directly to your phone! https://optin.mobiniti.com/prageru Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be donated to PragerU. Same great products. Same low price. Shopping made meaningful. VISIT PragerU! https://www.prageru.com FOLLOW us! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/ PragerU is on Snapchat! JOIN PragerFORCE! For Students: http://l.prageru.com/29SgPaX JOIN our Educators Network! http://l.prageru.com/2c8vsff Script: If you’re counting on Social Security to finance your retirement, you’re in for a big surprise—and not the good kind. Let me give you two reasons why. One: Social Security is going broke. And, two: Even if it weren’t going broke, it couldn’t possibly cover the cost of a decent retirement. Let’s look at these two reasons in a little more detail, and then I’ll propose a solution. Social Security is going broke. When this government program was set up in 1935, the average life expectancy was 60. But you couldn’t collect your first check until you reached 65. In other words, most people didn’t live long enough to receive Social Security. And most of those who did, didn’t collect it for very long. Today, the average lifespan is 79. So now, most people do live long enough to receive Social Security—for 10, or 20, or even 30 years. Here’s another important piece of information: When the program started, the ratio between worker and retiree was 159 to 1. That means for every one person drawing benefits, 159 were paying in. Today the ratio is 2.8 to 1. Get that? We’ve gone from 159 workers supporting every retired person to fewer than three workers supporting every retiree. And it’s going down. You don’t need an advanced math degree to figure this one out: Social Security is spending more than it’s bringing in. Far more. Its own Board of Trustees has said that it will be bankrupt within twenty years. That doesn’t mean it won’t exist. It means that either the government will pay you less than it promised, or it will have to raise taxes to make up the shortfall. Most likely, both. Sounds about right for an entitlement program, doesn’t it? Starts out small, but just keeps growing and growing until it collapses under its own weight. But let’s indulge in a fantasy and say that Social Security is perfectly designed, perfectly balanced, and efficiently run. And that you would get every dollar you were promised. You’d still have a major problem if that’s all that you’re relying on. To illustrate, in 2017 the average monthly Social Security check was a little over $1,400. That’s under $17,000 a year—barely above the poverty line for a two-person household. Do you really want to live at the poverty line in retirement? Why in the world would you plan for that? But sadly, many people are. According to a recent study, 53 percent of un-retired baby boomers have no retirement savings. That means they’re planning to rely on Social Security for their retirement income. That’s them. Don’t let it be you. For the complete script, visit https://www.prageru.com/videos/social-security-wont-give-you-security
Views: 648593 PragerU
What is the risk associated with Privatized Banking?
 
02:33
What is the risk associated with Privatized Banking? To understand the protection your money enjoys in a Privatized Banking structure, it is important to compare it to other traditional investments. On one end of the risk continuum is any typical investment that you might have including stocks, bonds, mutual funds, commodities, currency, precious metals or real estate. All of your capital is at risk with these investments and you have no guarantee of gain. With Privatized Banking, your funds will grow at a rate that is guaranteed within the contract between you and the life insurance company. The risk associated with this is mitigated in several ways: 1) Reserves -- Life Insurance companies are required by state law to maintain adequate reserves to be sure that they can meet all financial obligations including paying claims. 2) Ratings -- Most large life insurance companies submit to a regular audit by several different financial rating agencies. These ratings reflect the financial health of the company and are made public. We have a preferred group of companies that have financial strength ratings among the highest in the industry. 3) State insurance commissioner: All 50 states have an insurance commissioner responsible for the oversight of life insurance companies operating within their jurisdiction. If an insurance company has financial trouble or their reserves become inadequate, the commissioner can take over the operation of that company to protect the best interests of the policy holders. Typically a failing or failed company would be purchased by another more successful insurance company with very little disruption to day to day operations. 4) National Organization of Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Associations (NOLHGA): State life and health insurance guaranty associations provide a safety net for their state's policyholders, ensuring that they continue to receive coverage even if their insurer is declared insolvent. Working together through NOLHGA, the guaranty associations form a national safety net, protecting insurance consumers all across America in their time of need.
Views: 135 David Letourneau
Port privatization shows its influence in Greece
 
03:22
Greece's two major ports Piraeus and Thessaloniki, along with 10 regional ports, are up for sale through concession deals with property remaining in the hands of the government but management given away. Piraeus, strategically situated at the crossroads of Asia, Africa and Europe, is the first in line. Port privatizations are part of a delayed and wider sell-off scheme of Greece's public assets set by the country's international creditors. Filio Kontrafouri reports from Athens.
Views: 90 CGTN America
Odesa Port Privatisation: No bidders for USD 500 million state property
 
13:34
The highly anticipated and much needed privatization of Ukraine's property has started with a wrong foot. The public sale of one of the most lucrative pieces of state property – Odesa Port Plant – has failed. According to the official reports the starting price of around USD 530 million was too high. None of the potential buyers submitted their bids and the tender process was cancelled. Ukraine Today correspondent Volodymyr Solohub discusses the reasons for that as well as the way out for the government with the CEO of Concorde Capital investment company, Igor Mazepa. Check out our website: http://uatoday.tv Facebook: https://facebook.com/uatodaytv Twitter: https://twitter.com/uatodaytv
Views: 595 UKRAINE TODAY
Exclusive Interview: Large-scale privatization planned in Ukraine for 2016
 
11:55
Ukraine Today talks with Aivaras Abromavičius, Ukraine's Minister of Economic Development and Trade, to discuss the government's privatization plans. Aivaras Abromavičius: "First of all, I really believe that it should be priority No.1 for the economic bloc of the government and for the whole country for this year". (Among the most lucrative businesses are) the chemicals sector, the port infrastructure (we have a good amount of ports both on the river and the Black Sea coast) that should be interesting to foreigners, as well as electricity companies, machine building companies, a few companies in the agricultural sector that are about storage and production of alcohol spirit. These are about 22 different companies." There is no unanimous decision yet which companies would be sold this and nest year. We definitely believe that we should start with the Odesa Sea Side Port." Check out our website: http://uatoday.tv Facebook: https://facebook.com/uatodaytv Twitter: https://twitter.com/uatodaytv
Views: 674 UKRAINE TODAY
Ownership Rights and Privatization in Ukraine
 
01:45
Serhiy Tigipko, Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine, opened a panel discussion "Ukraine's Business Environment" at Dragon Capital's 7th Annual Investor, held on March 31, 2011 in Kyiv, Ukraine. Key quotes: - We do not see any serious gaps in protecting ownership rights in joint-stock companies. - All enterprises of no strategic value for the country should be privatized. - We need private investments to solve the problems in the thermal power engineering sector. - This year we will extend our privatization program of mines. - Businesses should be bought and sold in a transparent way. For more information on the conference please visit our web site: http://dragon-capital.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/464
Community Redevelopment ~ #Dont Know #Dont Show or #Dont Care
 
03:30
Florida continues to face increasing social challenges related to healthcare, crime, economic development, public safety and affordable housing, all of which require sound leadership and policy considerations.  The Florida legislature has demonstrated incredible leadership in addressing the aforementioned issues, however, much work is still needed to affect Community Redevelopment Reform.  In an effort to address a prevalent issue that most effects under served communities within our state -- "slum and blight" -- a focus should be placed on Community Redevelopment Agencies (CRA), which were legislatively created to directly impact impoverished communities. While Chapter 163, Part III, created CRA's to predominately focus on the human aspects of under served communities, over the years CRA's have actually placed a focus on utilizing resources as a government privatization investment fund for businesses.  Unfortunately, the definition of “slum & blight” has been broadly interpreted and lacks a prioritization that would allow limited CRA resources intended to help low income constituents in impoverished communities.  As an example of poor use of CRA funds, In Apopka, its CRA board, which had been inactive for several years, made its first priority the purchase of a parking lot for $200,000 with an estimated $600,000+ in repairs from a budget of $2.2 million dollars versus addressing the dilapidated housing conditions of residents within the CRA boundary.  Unfortunately, this is not unique to the City of Apopka.  Throughout Florida, the belief of CRA boards is that funds to businesses for "economic development" purposes effectively benefit those in the surrounding under served communities; but, this is a falsehood that must be corrected.  When the legislative intent of CRA's has been properly used to address slum and blight conditions of people, not businesses, they have proven to be great tools that positively impact under served communities. This is especially true in the area impacting one of its primary purposes, affordable housing. Increased affordable housing not only addresses slum and blight, but it could ultimately increase tax revenues and economic development opportunities to promote sustainable communities.    The unfortunate byproduct is what some may call gentrification, but may better be described as a misguided use of government dollars intended to improve the lives and living conditions of residents in under served communities -- not to benefit businesses. To be clear, Chapter 163, Part III was NOT established to serve as a handout to impoverished, crime ridden communities, but rather to serve as a tool to utilize existing resources to improve communities in economic despair.  To support the proper use of CRA funds, there is no prerequisite that you must reside within the affected communities in order to care about positively impacting legislation that was well intended to benefit “the least of these”.  A contribution of your talents, expertise and skill sets, i.e., legal, urban planning evaluation, etc., is welcomed.  If you are interested in assisting to seriously address this issue, please reply to [email protected]
Government Earmarks 500 Billion For Infrastructure Development
 
01:31
State minister for Finance for investment and privatization Evelyn Anite has insured investors in Namanve industrial park that government is to investors 500 billion shillings to facilitate infrastructural development. Namanve industrial park is currently faced with poor road network and drainage systems that have made accessibility quite difficult for some factory owners.
Views: 278 NBS TV Uganda
Privatization in Ukraine not designed to grow GDP, create jobs
 
03:06
Preview #5 of an interview with Paul R. Thomas, President IRE (USA) Inc. and Partner, Thomas and Simonova, Washington, D.C., United States of America, 8 September 2017. - Government of Ukraine does not have a goal or strategy for privatization. Currently the State Property Fund sells state companies to raise funds to finance the state budget, not to create jobs, grow Ukraine's GDP, etc. http://bestappraiser.com.ua/en Ukraine Needs Privatization Solutions – Not Simply Sales The Case of the Zaporizhia Aluminum Industrial Complex https://voxukraine.org/2017/06/21/ukraine-needs-privatization-solutions-not-simply-sales/ This video was not sponsored Video by UkeTube Ukrainian Video
Views: 41 UkeTube

Mgtio3 synthesis of aspirin
Differin adapalene gel 0 1 price in malaysia tag
Hydrochlorothiazide 12 5 mg and alcohol
Prednisolone acis 20 mg und alkohol test
Diltiazem sr mg