HomeОбразованиеRelated VideosMore From: darkness2noor

Yusuf Ismail vs. Radical Christians - "What your right hands possess" MISCONCEPTION addressed!

193 ratings | 5289 views
The extract is taken from Jonathan McLatchie's webinar found in the link below: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQouS48jQTg Sheikh Omer Suleiman's full clip is in the link below: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9be8TkbFShI&t=79s Articles and refutations to common Christian Islamophobic attacks against Islam - What the right hand posseses and slavery. https://discover-the-truth.com/2016/10/04/marriage-with-slaves-surah-43/ http://www.answering-christianity.com/right_hand_possession.htm http://www.answering-christianity.com/karim/no_rape_of_female_slaves.htm Credits: _____________________________________________________ Jurassic World clip owners and makers hold full rights. This is for educational purposes only. Jonathan McLatchie - Apologetics Academy Yusuf Ismail Sheikh Omer Suleiman Sheikh Abdullah al Matrood - Quran recitation
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Text Comments (87)
Bibi Salima (6 days ago)
this people did this with there own Bibble now they want to do the same with the Quran Allah is most wise thats why it had to stay in Arabic because English take it to Many ways mostly the dom Christians...
BIG BEN (3 months ago)
It is true ....muslims are LIARS! NIKAH (arabic) means HAVE SEX ! If you search you tube you will see that many islamic scholars say that you can have sex-slaves ! Moreover your best example to follow, mohammed ( al insan al kamel) had at least one sex-slave : Mary the copt . Mohammed had even a son with this sex-slave , so he USED her for sex! It is clear that Yusuf Imail is ashamed of his evil cult called islam (= SURRENDER ). STOP LYING !
ObjectiveIncision (4 months ago)
lol.. david wood understandably _hates_ 'context' being it's a conflict of interest to his darkets fetishes!
Faris Mee (6 months ago)
Of course we can have sex with whom our right hands possess. Even married women taken as slaves. Imam Ahmad recorded that Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri said, "We captured some women from the area of Awtas who were already married, and we disliked having sexual relations with them because they already had husbands. So, we asked the Prophet about this matter, and this Ayah was revealed- *And women in wedlock (are forbidden to you), except what your right hands possess. Thus has Allah ordained for you... **4:24* Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri (may ALLASH be pleased with him) continued "Consequently, we had sexual relations with these women." This is the wording collected by At-Tirmidhi An-Nasa'i, Ibn Jarir and Muslim in his Sahih. Ibn Kathir in his tafsir adds - Allah's statement, "Thus has Allah ordained for you" means, this prohibition was ordained for you by Allah. Therefore, adhere to Allah's Book, do not transgress His set limits, and adhere to His legislation and decrees.
Faris Mee (6 months ago)
*Sahih Muslim 3371—* We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace & blessings be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing azl (withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace & blessings be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.
Faris Mee (6 months ago)
*Qur'an 70:23-30* Except the observers of prayer - Those who are constant in their prayer. And those within whose wealth is a known right. For the beggar and the dispossessed. And those who believe in the Day of Recompense. And those who are fearful of the punishment of their Lord. Indeed, the punishment of their Lord is not that from which one is safe. And those who guard their private parts. EXCEPT FROM THEIR WIVES OR THOSE THEIR RIGHT HANDS POSSESS, FOR INDEED, THEY WILL NOT BE BLAMED.
Faris Mee (6 months ago)
*Qur’an 23:1-6* The believers have already prospered. The ones who in their prayer are submissive. And the ones who from idle talk are veering away. And the ones who at giving the Zakat are active. And they who guard their private parts. EXCEPT FROM THEIR WIVES OR THOSE THEIR RIGHT HANDS POSSESS, FOR INDEED, THEY WILL NOT BE BLAMED.
Indus Star (6 months ago)
I think that the Christian guy is referring to verse 33:50 when he mockingly questions, "marrying your own wives as well as those whom your right hands possess"? The verse 33:50 is again talking about women allowed for marriage (not sex as these missionaries like to think) but makes a distinction between the wives to whom the dower is given(free women) and the wives who were among the prisoners of war(such as the Prophet's Jewish wife Saffiya) whom he married but did not give a dower since it is not mandatory to give a dower when marrying a woman from among the slaves or prisoners of war. The key word in this verse is the "dower". "O PROPHET! Behold, We have made lawful to thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowers, as well as those whom thy right hand has come to possess from among the captives of war whom God has bestowed upon thee. And [We have made lawful to thee] the daughters of thy paternal uncles and aunts, and the daughters of thy maternal uncles and aunts, who have migrated with thee [to Yathrib];...(33:50) Like brother Yusuf Ismail told the guy concerning verses 4:24-25, , if the verse 33:50 was talking about just sex without the benefit of marriage, then is it also allowing it with daughters of uncles and aunts since they are also mentioned in the verse?
Indus Star (5 months ago)
Ryba125. Ofcourse the scholars are more knowledgeable than you or I. They agree at times and disagree on other times based on which evidence(or lack there of) they find more convincing. The Sahih Muslim hadith below was seen by some classical scholars as evidence of Prophet's marriage to Maria: “Abu Dharr reported Allah’s Messenger as saying: You would soon conquer Egypt and that is a land which is known (as the land of al-qirat). So when you conquer it, treat its inhabitants well. For there lies upon you the responsibility because of blood-tie or relationship of MARRIAGE (WITH THEM). And when you see two persons falling into dispute amongst themselves for the space of a brick, than get out of that. He (Abu Dharr) said: I saw Abd al-Rahman b. Shurahbil b. Hasana and his brother Rabi’a disputing with one another for the space of a brick. So I left that (land). (Sahih Muslim Book 31, Hadith 6174) Based on this hadith, a classical scholar, Scholar Abu Zakariya Yahya Bin Sharaf An-Nawawi Dimashqi (1233 – 1277 AD) noted: “In this Hadith, the Prophet PBUH) had urged his Companions to treat the Egyptians nicely for the reason of maintaining the ties of kinship and for the fact that Egypt was the country OF HIS IN-LAWS (Mariyah, the mother of Ibrahim, and one of the Prophet’s wives was from that place). This is why this Hadith has been included in the present chapter which deals with the subject of maintaining the ties of kinship. This Hadith is also a Prophecy of the Prophet (PBUH) due to the fact that the Prophecy he had made came true. A short time after his death, Egypt became part of the Muslim empire.” Ismail Ibn Kathir (1301 – 1373 AD) wrote about Maria: “He also had two WIVES donated to him. The first of these were MARIYA AL-QUBTIYYA al-Misriyya, from Kawrat Ansina, who was the mother of his son Ibrahim, upon whom be peace. The second was Rayhana al-Quraziyya, daughter of Sham’un; she accepted Islam and he manumitted her. She then rejoined her family. …” (Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya, volume 4, page 415 – 416) [13] So as you see, there is evidence in both Hadith and sira that can be taken either way because of the lack of precise language.
Ryba125 (5 months ago)
Indus Star I didnt adress your arguments simply because I list facts and opinions from scholars who, I thinks, where not dumb and more knowledgeable than you and me. So they very probably pondered about it and give it no weight, or a weight that didn't shift their opinions. I'm not a muslim scholar so I only cite them to you. But if you want my opinion, he did not marry them because the obligations he has to slaves are different that to wives and he already had 9 wives. Remember that the sira also has a important role in your religion, don't drop it. If they are not incluted its because the consencus is against it, you can't simply add them because you find it better, you have to have proofs. Imagine if every muslim added what he feels nice to your prophet life, what would happen ? If this was strongly debated islamqa would have speak about it, but they simply, with multiples sources, state that they where unmarried. Remember also that the article is written in English, if concubine had an another meaning they would have used another word, or left it in arabic an explained its meaning in the beginning.
Indus Star (5 months ago)
Ryba125. I know that you understand very well that the women included in the wives list are the ones about whom there is a strong evidence, but those about whom there is scant evidence available, such as Maria and Rayhaanah, they are not included in the list, which doesn't automatically mean that they were not his wives, but only shows that there is very little evidence available about them. Even then, there is strong speculation about Rayhannah being his wife as you can see at the end of the article, but again, due to lack of enough info about her, she is being excluded by the scholars. I notice that you didn't even bother to address some of the reasons I listed which make it very unlikely that Maria was a mere concubine. Also take into consideration that the word "concubine" is an English word with a completely different connotation than the the word, " I think it is the wishful thinking on your part that forces you to insist that the Prophet had concubines. What you've given me as "proof" are opinions of scholars, not concrete evidence that these women were concubines of the Prophet. If you can find that concrete, indisputable evidence in the hadith, I'd be happy to change my views. Even then, it wouldn't make him a bad person since concubinage was practiced by some of the other prophets of the Bible like Moses and David. Later.
Ryba125 (5 months ago)
I didnt make claim, islamqa made them, "We can see that rayhaanah is excluded from the 9 surviving wives list and that there is no difference of opinion" is due to "These are the wives of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) with whom he consummated marriage. Two of them died during the lifetime of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), namely Khadeejah and Zaynab bint Khuzaymah (may Allaah be pleased with them both). The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) left behind nine wives when he died; there is no difference of scholarly opinion on this matter. " Now if you think i'm wrong show me her name in the list above this quote... Same for Mariyah al-Qibtiyyah :"The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) did not marry Mariyah al-Qibtiyyah, rather she was a concubine " Even if you don't like it that was educated muslims came to... More citations ? " He took possession of Safiyyah and Juwayriyah and he freed them and married them; he took possession of Rayhaanah bint Sham’oon al-Nadariyyah and Maariyah al-Qibtiyyah, the mother of his son Ibraaheem (peace be upon them both), and they were among his concubines, may Allaah be pleased with them both. Tafseer Ibn Katheer, 3/500 " The same as i already said, no marriage for the last two, simply concubines. Also note that Maariyah isn't even mentioned in the first article, (the one that list your prophets wives) when rayhaanah is mentioned but at the bottom of the page , without a number, and immediately excluded. If you think that muhammad should have married her, of course he should have, but consensus said that he didn't. If you think he did but it was somewhat lost, i can only contemplate this wishful thinking...
Indus Star (5 months ago)
Ryba125-You gave us the following link from the Islamicqa . https://islamqa.info/en/47072 You also made the following claim, "We can see that rayhaanah is excluted from the 9 surviving wives list and that there is no difference of opignion." This is how people like you mix your own lies with the truth to confuse others. No where does it say in that article that Rayhaana was definitely a concubine and that there is no difference of scholarly opinion on it! On the contrary, the article states the following: "It was said that Rayhaanah bint ‘Amr al-Nadariyyah (or al-Quraziyyah) was also one of his wives. She was taken prisoner during the battle of Bani Qurayzah, and the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) chose her for himself and married her, then he divorced her then took her back. Tabaqaat Ibn Sa’d , narrating from al-Waaqidi, 8/130 And it was said that she was a concubine. This was regarded as more likely by Ibn al-Qayyim in Zaad al-Ma’aad." So as you can see, there is speculation and difference of opinion about whether she was a wife or not. that is because the hadith do not contain extensive information about her which leads to speculations. In the same article, we see that Juwayriyah and Saffiyya, both of whom were prisoners of war(like Rayhaanah), are also included as wives of the prophet...which only leaves out Maria. This begs the question, why would the Prophet(pbuh) marry prisoners of wars like Safiyyah, Juwayriyah, and Rayhaana, but keep only Maria as a concubine? In the second article from Islamicqa that you linked, we can see that she was respected and honored so much that the Caliph of the state, Umar(ra) personally lead her funeral prayers. Why would he do that for a mere concubine? The fact that she had become a Muslim and bore the Prophet a son whom he named after the common patriarch of all three Abrahamic faith, Ibrahim(Abraham), makes it even more unlikely that he wouldn't have given her the respect of marriage. Again, the reason then that she is sometimes not included in the list of Prophet's wives is because there is not enough detailed info available in the hadith literature about her or her wedding to the Prophet. It is very likely that this event did not make it into the hadith when they were collected over a hundred years later so the scholars are reluctant to claim definitively that Maria was married to the Prophet without any concrete evidence. This doesn't mean that she wasn't, especially when it makes very little sense considering the reasons I listed.
Andalusia T.O.L (7 months ago)
How many Christians or Jews follow those old(More radical)Mosaic Laws from 3500 years ago. The Qur'an 33:21 says in the prophet you will find a beautiful pattern of conduct to follow. Millions of Muslims are still today following this nonsense. *Youtube~"Sacrificing our Daughters: On the Psychology of Islamic Rape-Gangs"* Define 'Mutah' wives Imam? Imam Al-Tabari's Ta'rikh VI:138-139 shows how Muhammad basically declared war with mankind. He made a pledge with his companions at Aqabah to make war with all men, and he used the Quran 8:39 as justification. Then the doctrine of 'Dur Al Islam - Dur Al Harb' developed, which basically calls everything outside the control of Islam the house of War. So everything outside of control of Islam is basically in a Perpetual state of war with Islam. This is the mindset of many in Islam throughout much of Islamic history. *Youtube~"Quran - Verse of the Sword [9:5]"* *ATTENTION .03 - **1:05** minutes!* Dr. Shabir Ally admits this IS what prevailed throughout much of Islam's history. Qur'anic ayahs such as Surah 9:5 nullified or abrogated the more peaceful so-called Meccan Ayahs!!!! So the result of this mindset currently in the 21st century we have thousands of young girls, infidel girls in Great Britain being groomed or brutally gang raped largely by Pakistani Muslims. And people are you are more offended by people like me than people like them. You are basically apologist for these monsters. 🖕😡
New Game 4K (7 months ago)
haha, that christian stupid is smashed out completely.
syed ahmed (10 months ago)
LOL its that uneducated Robert.
AL OM (10 months ago)
*Only in Jesus (The Pure Son of GOD)* and *His jewish apostle* is *the True Islam and The True GOD (ABBA)* , but not in qur`an, sunna, shia, sharia, ... and kaaba! ♡🔯♡ لا إله إلا الله في يسوع المسيح ♡🔯♡ *La Ilahe il Allah, fi Yahshuah haMeshiah! Mashallah, Mashallah, Mashallah!* The Islam of antichrist uthman ibn affan and his antichristian verses in qur'an is haram, because inspired by the greatest antichrist and false "god" --> satan (shaytan)! ,
s QUADAIMAT (11 months ago)
christians defend the undefendable .
Has B (11 months ago)
Who is brother Yusuf debating?
Wario (11 months ago)
But in Hadiths the sahaba had sex with women while the husbands were away. Can someone explain?
autumnicleaf (3 months ago)
+walsallhc1 - Sorry - Here's the refuting video- https://youtu.be/W28a6xU0bb4
autumnicleaf (5 months ago)
Wario - Absolutely not. Please watch this video; it's a trove of evidences.
feedsunj (1 year ago)
Brother - can i ask what software do you use to make your videos Akhi ?
feedsunj (1 year ago)
darkness2noor - Jazakhullahkhair Brother
darkness2noor (1 year ago)
Pinnacle Studio 15 and Hit Film 4 Express. Hit Film 4 express is freeware and it has many tutorials on youtube. I think you can pick it up easy.
Unosonic (1 year ago)
but what is your right hand posses
Unosonic (1 year ago)
incorrect my freind it is war criminals
Yunus - Jonah (1 year ago)
Seagson Slaves, everyone everywhere had slaves back then and even today there are slaves in London and other western christian cities and countries
You & Me (1 year ago)
Birth Place Of Prophet Muhammed Saw Peace Be Upon Him https://youtu.be/YGRX6TF3h3g
You & Me (1 year ago)
Birth Place Of Prophet Muhammed Saw Peace Be Upon Him https://youtu.be/YGRX6TF3h3g
sepoi ajiking (1 year ago)
Love u yusuf ismail. Brilliant.
heera rodriguez (1 year ago)
Indeed, the only way accepted to God is Submission. Sick beliefs propagated by Christians and even sick Muslims thinking about sex and not justice.
Wes _Kada (1 year ago)
Muhammad was not a prophet. Every prophet that came was Jewish. muhammad killed Jews. Fun fact. muhammed had never received a revelation directly from God, all of muhammads "revelations" came from the angle Gabriel. Why did it take almost 300 years after muhammads death to start publishing the quran? Muslims claim the Quran is a miracle becuae of Elif La Meem and the number 19. Muhammad never wrote the quran. The book was passed down for 300 years and perfected by scholars before it was published. Please do not misinterprete a very crafty book as the word of God.
BESTMAHMOUD10VEVO (11 months ago)
Actually the Qu'ran wasn't published after 300 years, all your points don't have evidence supporting them.
Wes Kada Every prophet that came was ‘Jewish’ 😂😂 Judah was the great grandson of Abraham you ignoramus. How was Abraham ‘Jewish’? How was Isaac and Jacob ‘Jewish’? How was Moses ‘Jewish’ when he wasn’t from the tribe of Judah but was a Levi? The Jews can’t even tell us what Moses called his religion in their ‘perfectly preserved’ teachings. Ps. Moses killed more ‘Jews’ than Muhammad when he ordered 3000 of his own people to be put to the sword for worshipping the calf. Moses killed more pagans, women and children than Muhammad ever ever did (Numbers 31:14-18 - mass killing of young male boys and women). Yet despite this, Muhammad has brought way way more people to the God of Moses worldwide than Moses did.
Ahmed Bashir Ribadu (1 year ago)
what a job well done to "the scholars who perfected the Quran". Are you implying that they have done a greater job than the writers both the Old and New testiment ("inspired word of God")?!!
Wa7ed Wa7ish (1 year ago)
Wes Kada fun fact, not all Prophets were Jewish, Adam (PBUH) wasn't Jewish. Noah (PBUH) wasn't Jewish. and there are more. Another fun fact, the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH), according to Western, Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, Indian and every other scholors was infact a PROPHET. The only people that don't think he was a prophet are ignorant morons like you. The holy Quran wasn't "published" 300 years after the death of the prophet, it was compiled after the death of the prophet. Maybe you don't know what compiled means so Google it moron. Basically your so-called fun facts aren't facts at all they are just copied from antiislamic websites you retard. Learn what a fact is!!
Wa7ed Wa7ish (1 year ago)
Wes Kada you my friend are a moron.
pindi boy (1 year ago)
MASHALLAH GREAT BAYAN AND RECITATION ... I LIKE UR HUMOUR BTW GOOD WORK KEEP IT UP <3
bink bee (1 year ago)
Hahahahaha!!
Xoz eXoz (1 year ago)
Salamu Alaikum brother darkness2noor. Are you going to make a video about the recent Zakir Hussain and James White debate that took place about the crucifixion?
Xoz eXoz (1 year ago)
jazakAllah akhi
darkness2noor (1 year ago)
Walekum assalam wr wb. Yes Insha Allah.
TariqTheTutor (1 year ago)
Salam brothers and sisters! If you are interested in learning Arabic, the Fusha Arabic of the Quran, come visit my channel. My style of teaching is different and it might be the style that suits you. Watch a lesson from the middle of the current list of 16 lessons, just pick one. If you find the lessons useful, don’t forget to subscribe and hit the notification button (the one that looks like a bell) so you would know when lesson 17 is published. Peace Upon You all! Oh and don't forget to share with your friends!
Ryba125 (1 year ago)
muslims uses those verses for century to justify the rape of slavegirls but it seems that modern ones are better at understanding verses that the first generations...
omer ali (23 days ago)
Ačcording to Maliki fiqh, the earliest establoshed fiqh, sex with slaves without their consent is not allowed.
Aizatul Fikri (1 year ago)
Ryba125 yeah you never read it because before "as you mention 1920" and as of now...there is no law for slave right or anything yo protect them....in other words slave to western like youraelf is nothing more but less than animal,even animal been protected..
Ryba125 (1 year ago)
Aizatul Fikr Care to give me some sources ? I never read about it exept the forced labor of Jews by the nazis.
Aizatul Fikri (1 year ago)
Ryba125 stop slavery😂😂😂 seem like it that you didnt want to admit history...slavery is everywhere in world war
Ryba125 (1 year ago)
Aizatul Fikri World wars were almost only fought on European soil... we stopped slavery way before 1920, year of closing of the last slave market in saudi arabia (due to English pressure). Read history.
SpectreDonut (1 year ago)
dude I love your channel👌👌👌👌 keep it up
Ixxros Sorxxi (1 year ago)
The little shit on the other side simple DOESN'T care what Yusuf Ismail says. He couldn't refute ANYTHING. LOOOOL
Nasar Zaman (1 year ago)
I see a lot of Muslims doing this too when it comes to the bible it's not just Christians. Think it's best to leave the other persons scripture aside and focus on your own.
mohamed gweda (5 months ago)
Andalusia T.O.L no u r hypocrites
mohamed gweda (5 months ago)
Nasar Zaman the point is U have no ground to claim such and such while u have worse direct things in your book It is like shooting yourself in the foot
Andalusia T.O.L (7 months ago)
Nasar Zaman Especially since no Christian on Earth tries to emulate what Joshua and Moses did 3500 years ago. But on the other hand> (Surah 33:21) *THERELIGIONOFPEACE.COM*
Mohamed Amin (1 year ago)
Hahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhha. The best video
AllianceWithChina1 (1 year ago)
It amazes me in Christian societies fornication out side marriage is an accepted act ,,, and fornication in Islam is a major sin and punishable by death, and why are Christian's projecting there desired sexual promiscuity on Muslims as if, Muslims are like them
cat loran (1 year ago)
I live in the USA and pedophilia is a rampant crime here. Most the crimes against children are not reported. in the UK, the crown is covering up for a gang of rapists from the elites who have raped thousands of children in last 15 years. several thousand complaints logged already but nothing is done about these pedophiles.
DABAT UL ARD!!!!!! (1 year ago)
imam syed Good point, I should have noticed that too , people often confuse adultery and fornication.
Imam (1 year ago)
Sorry brother, but you are wrong. Fornication within Islam is punishable through the Had punishment which calls for 100 lashes. *(Surah Noor 24 Ayah 2)*. The punishment of ADULTERY is DEATH by stoning. The Prophet sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam ( may Allah exalt his mention ) set the penalty for adultery and fornication as follows: *"If the parties (committing fornication) are unmarried, they should receive a hundred lashes and be put into exile for a year. If they commit adultery after they are married, they should receive a hundred lashes and then be stoned to death." [Muslim]* Fornication is intercourse outside of marriage. Adultery is intercourse within marriage.
DABAT UL ARD!!!!!! (1 year ago)
AllianceWithChina1 Let's not forget about how they call us pedophiles, when in fact their priests/pastors are widely known for this, they feel the need to try to bring us down on their level. Agreed.
AMR (1 year ago)
Right hand posses is general word it means: everybody living under your house hold includes family members, servers, orphans you are taking care of, war captured you are taking care of.....etc.
Madara Uchiha (2 months ago)
BESTMAHMOUD10VEVO reference for the tafsir?
BESTMAHMOUD10VEVO (11 months ago)
+Spectre donut +Abu muhamed Alle Al Ansari You're retarded, this is the TAFSIR.
SpectreDonut (1 year ago)
AMR buulllllllshit
AMR any reference ?
Zee S (1 year ago)
Nailed it bro.
Smile Smile (1 year ago)
Yusuf ismail brother love your arguments. You are always straight on to points. May Allah protect you ameen
yacine chraibi (1 year ago)
Abu Umama (may Allah be pleased with him) reports: "The Prophet saw me as I moved my lips, and he asked me," What do you say, Abu Umama? "I mention Allah, I will tell you what is more than the recall of Allah in the night and the day, Say: الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ عَدَدَ مَا خَلَقَ، وَالْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ مِلْءَ مَا خَلَقَ، وَالْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ عَدَدَ مَا فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَمَا فِي الأَرْضِ، وَالْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ عَدَدَ مَا أَحْصَى كِتَابُهُ، وَالْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ مِلْءَ مَا أَحْصَى كِتَابُهُ، وَالْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ عَدَدَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ، وَالْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ مِلْءَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ سُبْحَانَ اللهِ عَدَدَ مَا خَلَقَ، سُبْحَانَ اللهِ مِلْءَ مَا خَلَقَ، سُبْحَانَ اللهِ عَدَدَ مَا فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَمَا فِي الأَرْضِ، سُبْحَانَ اللهِ عَدَدَ مَا أَحْصَى كِتَابُهُ، سُبْحَانَ اللهِ مِلْءَ مَا أَحْصَى كِتَابُهُ، سُبْحَانَ اللهِ عَدَدَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ، سُبْحَانَ اللهِ مِلْءَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ
Mrjames Cotter (1 year ago)
god enjoys watching rape https://turchisrong.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/divine-atrocities-of-old-testament-god.html rape in the bible answering james holding https://turchisrong.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/answer-to-jp-holdings-wheel-of-stupid.html rape https://turchisrong.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/reply-to-james-patrick-holding-turkels.html raping young children biblical way https://turchisrong.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/demolishing-triablogue-steve-hays-fails.html
ShitGotReal (1 year ago)
👍👍
Mrjames Cotter (1 year ago)
quote : Does your God approve of pedophilia? Part 7: Ezekiel 16 establishes nothing except more apologetics embarrassment Most Christian apologists, once confronted with the fact that the bible never specifies the age or conditions a girl must minimally reach to be qualified for marriage (i.e., the bible god doesn't appear to think martial pedophilia is sufficiently immoral to deserve specific commentary as much as "justification by faith"), immediately cite to God's having metaphorical sex with Jerusalem: 1 Then the word of the LORD came to me, saying, 2 "Son of man, make known to Jerusalem her abominations 3 and say, 'Thus says the Lord GOD to Jerusalem, "Your origin and your birth are from the land of the Canaanite, your father was an Amorite and your mother a Hittite. 4 "As for your birth, on the day you were born your navel cord was not cut, nor were you washed with water for cleansing; you were not rubbed with salt or even wrapped in cloths. 5 "No eye looked with pity on you to do any of these things for you, to have compassion on you. Rather you were thrown out into the open field, for you were abhorred on the day you were born. 6 "When I passed by you and saw you squirming in your blood, I said to you while you were in your blood, 'Live!' Yes, I said to you while you were in your blood, 'Live!' 7 "I made you numerous like plants of the field. Then you grew up, became tall and reached the age for fine ornaments; your breasts were formed and your hair had grown. Yet you were naked and bare. 8 "Then I passed by you and saw you, and behold, you were at the time for love; so I spread My skirt over you and covered your nakedness. I also swore to you and entered into a covenant with you so that you became Mine," declares the Lord GOD. (Ezek. 16:1-8 NAU) https://turchisrong.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/does-your-god-approve-of-pedophilia_71.html
Waleed Idrissi (1 year ago)
I have a question that it's outta subject a lil. Christians say Islam is violent by quoting the verses of Surah 9. But Islam has many good stuff in it. And the scholars say that Surah 9:5 have abrogated all the peaceful verses in the Quran. What's the response?
BESTMAHMOUD10VEVO (11 months ago)
it's explained in 9:13where it says those people tried to expel the prophet and had begun the attack upon muslims, in arabic it doesn't use the word attack, but he added it so you understand it, if they didn't do so the translation would have been "and started upon you", does that even make sense?
AH03 (1 year ago)
Waleed Idrissi Ibn Kathir rahimahullah says that it doesn't abrogate,please read tafsir ibn kathir.
Poltics Channel HD (1 year ago)
Waleed Idrissi Here is a response https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bJlfe68jvZ0 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=k8a-PnzyRDQ http://www.answering-christianity.com/karim/Karim__-articles_islamic_answers-____part_2/Jihad_-_a_war_against_all_Non-Muslims_or_not.pdf https://discover-the-truth.com/2016/04/22/an-historical-examination-of-the-sword-verse-surah-95/amp/ https://discover-the-truth.com/2014/03/04/quran-95-sword-verse/amp/
Waleed Idrissi which Scholars said that and base on what and what do they mean abrogated ? Those questions need to be clarify first
BIG BANG (1 year ago)
https://discover-the-truth.com/2014/03/04/quran-95-sword-verse/amp/
Ubay-dullah The Tutor (1 year ago)
This is gold
Ubay-dullah The Tutor (1 year ago)
Hhhhhh

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.